http://amzn.to/9a4IiK

แสดงบทความที่มีป้ายกำกับ Project แสดงบทความทั้งหมด
แสดงบทความที่มีป้ายกำกับ Project แสดงบทความทั้งหมด
วันอาทิตย์ที่ 26 กันยายน พ.ศ. 2553 0 ความคิดเห็น

The Genius Project - A Simple Problem, What Geniuses Do


More findings from my good friend Mr. Jay Niblick', The Genius Project.

A Simple Problem

The problem he found was that the vast majority of people assume there is no real difference between natural and acquired talents. They assume that all talents can be developed through intelligence, training and hard work. They fail to appreciate just how fixed these neural networks really are. Instead, because they assume that all talent can be acquired, they set about identifying what talents they need for a given role and then start trying to develop them. They take training programs, they read books, they attend seminars, they get mentors and coaches and they do a whole host of things to try and develop their talents for their job.

What happens, though, is that they manage to develop only the acquired talents. They don't change their neural networks. They don't create new natural talents and so in the end they become one of the most knowledgeable sales people in the company, but they still don't think like the great sales people. They become the greatest knowledge expert on the planet for the rules of accounting and workings of mathematics, but they still don't think like the great accountants do. They become the pilot who knows more about the technical manual than the engineer who wrote it, but they still don't meld with the controls and become one with the plane as an extension of their own body - like the great pilots do.

By assuming that training and development will develop all the talents they need many people, and organizations, fail to understand that they are only building up half of the picture. When the other half of the picture isn't there (the natural talents half) they wonder why they continue to struggle; continue to be emotionally unengaged and continue to lack a certain passion for their work. Unfortunately, when people fail to achieve the level of performance they want, the solution is often even more training and knowledge.

People spend a great deal of time trying to put in talents that are just not there to begin with, and aren't going to be put in regardless of the effort. They exert a tremendous amount of energy attempting to change themselves, when in reality it is the job that needs to be changed. That's what geniuses do.

What Geniuses Do

The most successful people he studied, those who people refer to as geniuses at what they do, don't make this simple mistake. Remember the two things that Geniuses do. First, geniuses possess a superior level of self-awareness, so they know what their natural talents are (and are not). Second, they are also very authentic, so they find ways to achieve success that rely on these talents. They find jobs that rely on their natural talents, not their ability to develop new talents. They find roles that play to their strengths, not their weaknesses. When they do this, they find that the work comes more naturally and success more frequently.

The most successful among us don't spend their lives trying to become the A%2B student in that difficult class we mentioned in my last article. Because they understand that they are who they are, instead of wasting energy trying to become something they are not, they invest it in trying to better apply that which they already are. In a sense, they stop trying to put in what God left out and instead work with what he put in! This frees up a lot of extra energy. Imagine how much more successful you would be if 100% of your energy was directed towards just using your natural talents.

By being as authentic as they are, geniuses are free to pour all of their time and energy into doing more of what they already do naturally well, instead of being distracted by trying to develop what they don't already have. This is not to say that Geniuses don't grow or continue to refine themselves. Dr. Marshall Goldsmith, one of the Geniuses interviewed for this study, says of refining himself, "I constantly try to refine the strengths I have, but that doesn't mean I try to develop things I don't already have. One danger in the message of only focusing on strengths is that people may perceive this to mean that they don't have to improve at all. Rather within their natural talents they must always improve. The key is to find a role that depends primarily on what you do well, and then continue to get even better at it through practice, awareness and acquired knowledge and experience."

If they need to acquire new knowledge or experience, Geniuses definitely do. But if the job calls for natural talents that they don't possess, they either find another way to do that job, or they find another job. That's what the very best do, and that's what my last few and next few articles are all about. Remember the formula for 5th level performance; Self-Awareness %2B Authenticity = Success.

The key to being "true", however, is not about identifying weaknesses so you can turn them into strengths, which is what most theories on personal improvement would argue. The Genius Study shows that the best among us take a very different approach to their weaknesses. While the best do indeed seek to understand their weaknesses very well, they do not do so for the purposes of fixing them, rather they use this knowledge to create objectives, goals, and roles that simply do not depend on those weaknesses. Such thinking runs counter to conventional wisdom, which teaches us that the key to greater success lies in eliminating weaknesses. Geniuses wouldn't argue that eliminating weakness is the key to success, but it's how they eliminate them that is so different. Instead of eliminating the weakness, they eliminate their dependence on it. There are lots of things Geniuses do, so let's let them tell you what some of those things are. Here's what just some of the geniuses Jay interviewed for the study had to say about their natural talents, self-awareness and authenticity when it comes to being successful.

Marshall Goldsmith on Self-Awareness

"I think I am very aware of my strengths. My strengths are being very good at coaching others - specifically the teaching aspect of coaching due to my love and passion for teaching. I love teaching and I'm very good at it because, in part, I am very good at taking complex concepts and organizing them in a simple way that is easy to understand and therefore one of the gifts I have for teaching others. My job is helping others set realistic goals, evaluating them in those goals, and teaching them how to reach them better. As for my weaknesses, I am not good at managing people, but I just don't do it. I have lots of weaknesses, I just don't do them and I have no interest in correcting them. I constantly try to refine the strengths I have, but that doesn't mean I try to develop things I don't already possess. One of the keys to my success is that I've been able to find a role, or create one actually, that depends primarily on the natural talents I already possess."

Francis Hesselbein on Authentic Passion

"Peter Drucker would say all the time, 'your job is to make the strengths of your people effective and their weaknesses irrelevant!' I think I've always been very aware of my strengths and weaknesses. When I am at my best it is when I am focusing on what I do best, when I am less effective it is when I am ignoring those talents but choose to carry out those practices which rely on my non-talents. The thing to keep in mind is that success is a matter of how to be, not how to do. People like you and me have never had a job. They have been called to do what they do best. Warren Bennis calls it the leader within or the spirit within.

When you are doing things that align with your talents and strengths, you don't consider it work. It is your passion. I think the purpose of a good leader is to mobilize people around a passionate mission, but it has to be in their way to reach their passion. Great leadership requires the best and to be the absolute best you can't be false, you can't be trying to be great at something you aren't

naturally great at."








Mr. Timothy A. McGinty is the published co-author of the highly regarded Wake Up... Live the Life You Love? series. This series is a collaborative effort with such inspirational leaders as Tony Robbins, Dr. Wayne Dyer, Brian Tracey, Steven E, and Lee Beard.

Mr. McGinty is also the author of "Your Blissful Life", a book which takes the reader by the hand and walks them through a process for defining their "Blissful Life" and the action plan for achieving it.

Imagine Yourself... is an organization focused on enabling clients "breakthrough" in achieving their success. Mr. McGinty has helped many organizations and individuals discover their passion, define the life balance they seek, develop strategies for achieving that balance, and held them accountable for reaching their goals. His clients have been so successful that Mr. McGinty is known as "The Breakthrough Guy"

Imagine Yourself...
13477 Prospect Rd. Suite 204
Strongsville, Ohio 44149
Telephone: 440-236-6519
Web: http://www.timothymcginty.com
E-mail: tim@timothymcginty.com


0 ความคิดเห็น

The Genius Project


My good friend Jay Niblick, founder of Innermentrix International, recently completed a study called The Genius Project. His study became the basis for his latest book, What's Your Genius? The results from The Genius Project are incredibly interesting. Before I share the results with you, let me explain what The Genius Project was all about.

The Genius Project grew out of a desire to better understand two things:


What was the cause of the problem he was seeing with many of his clients where they were frustrated and under-performing.
What were the real implications of it for those effected by what he call "The Problem"

The Genius Project spanned seven years and involved hundreds of thousands of individuals across twenty-three countries. Each individual was given a scientifically validated instrument to measure their ability in a wide variety of attributes relevant to individual performance. These attributes were naturally occurring talents that people possessed based on how they think and make decisions. The science behind this instrument had been rigorously validated and proven in business use for more than fifty years. The study itself was designed to compare the level of these natural talents in the most successful people against the levels in non-successful people. Our hope was to see if we could find out what differences, if any, could be found that might answer our questions.

One of the reasons he chose the Attribute Index, an assessment based on the science of axiology, for this study was because it measures natural talents for thinking and making decisions. As such, these natural talents are pretty much hard-wired, which means they are permanently set or fixed. In other words, they are the result of the way the neural networks in our brains operate, and as such they do not change much over the course of our lives. As a result he was very interested in finding out if having any of these attributes (Talents) was significantly linked to achieving greater levels of performance. It is because of their permanent nature that he refers to them as natural talents (as opposed to learned or acquired talents which I'll cover in a my next post). He also chose these attributes because his company had lots of experience with them, which is important when you are trying to understand what these data are or are not telling you. And finally, he chose to work with these attributes because we already had over 75 PhDs and 900 certified professional consultants and coaches around the world with the experience and understanding required to accurately administer and interpret the results as well - which was vital if he was going to be able to gather good data.

All good research follows the basic principles of the scientific method. Those steps are:

1. Ask a Question

2. Do Background Research

3. Construct a Hypothesis

4. Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment

5. Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion

6. Communicate Your Results

1. The question he asked was, "why do some people seem to succeed frequently and with much less effort while others, who put in similar amounts of effort, have similar abilities and intelligence and exist in the very same environment, fail to succeed to the same degree."

2. The initial background research he conducted was that we began talking with as many people as we could about this question. He interviewed people who were and were not satisfied with their level of success. He spoke with industrial and organizational psychologists, thought leaders, educators, and experts in personal development. In the consulting work he did, he was already using the Attribute Index to actually measure individual thinking and decision-making styles so he started monitoring the results of those profiles to see if any trends popped out

3. The hypothesis he developed was, "based on observation and anecdotal evidence, the more self-aware someone is of their natural talents, and the more they incorporate this knowledge into the work they do the more successful they are." In other words, the truer someone was to their natural talents - the more successful they were

4. The experiment he did to prove or disprove this hypothesis became the heart of the Genius Project itself wherein he profiled over 300,000 people around the world and statistically compared their scores with their level of performance to see what correlations would show up. He was interested in knowing if there were any single talents, or sets of talents, that only the most successful people possessed in high amounts.

5. Hisr analysis of all of this data (over 24,000,000 bits of it) revealed some significant findings that I will reveal in my future posts..

What's a Genius?

To be able to statistically compare the differences between the most and least successful

people, we needed to separate them into categories of performance. We started with a

fairly universal set of four levels of performance:


1st Level - below average
2nd Level - average
3rd Level - above average
4th Level - excellent 

Very early on, however, as he started interviewing people and looking at the best performers, he began to see the need for perhaps yet another level of performance. Those who were describing the absolute best performers they knew were having trouble with the four levels of performance we were using. The interviewees were telling him that these people were better than excellent. You've no doubt seen this yourself. Think of someone who is so damn good at what they do that they are better than "excellent." The word falls short of conveying just how good these people really are, and you want to give them aneven stronger description.

"Genius is the ability to put into effect what is in your mind"

~ F. Scott Fitzgerald

Time and time again, as he interviewed people, the most common word they used to describe this level of performance was "genius". They would say, "John is so great at seeing the big picture, he is a genius" or, "Mary is an absolute genius when it comes to understanding the client's problem." Because we heard this talk of "better than excellent" so much, we decided to add another level of performance on top of excellent.

This became the 5th Level of performance and because we heard the word genius so many times, that became the nickname for this new Level of performance.

The revised rankings then became:


1st Level - Below average
2nd Level - Average
3rd Level - Above average
4th Level - Excellent
5th Level - Genius

Finally, since he was searching for what explained some people's ability to achieve the 5th level of performance, and become a Genius for what they do, it only made sense to call the whole thing the Genius Project.

When he says Genius, by the way, we aren't referring to a person's IQ. Our use of the term genius has nothing to do directly with how intelligent a person is and everything to do with how well they perform. Our use of genius is descriptive of a person's ability to perform, not their ability to acquire facts or information (the more classical definition of genius).

His definition of a Genius is: a natural and joyful ability for delivering the highest levels of performance. The natural part of this definition comes from the fact that these abilities are driven by your natural talents, and the joyful part comes from the fact that being true to your natural talents is not only more comfortable, but also more productive (both of which are more joyful).

my next few articles will provide you with the findings from The Genius Project, what the results mean to you, and how you can use the findings to achieve your own genius.








Mr. Timothy A. McGinty is the published co-author of the highly regarded Wake Up... Live the Life You Love? series. This series is a collaborative effort with such inspirational leaders as Tony Robbins, Dr. Wayne Dyer, Brian Tracey, Steven E, and Lee Beard.

Mr. McGinty is also the author of "Your Blissful Life", a book which takes the reader by the hand and walks them through a process for defining their "Blissful Life" and the action plan for achieving it.

Imagine Yourself... is an organization focused on enabling clients "breakthrough" in achieving their success. Mr. McGinty has helped many organizations and individuals discover their passion, define the life balance they seek, develop strategies for achieving that balance, and held them accountable for reaching their goals. His clients have been so successful that Mr. McGinty is known as "The Breakthrough Guy"

Imagine Yourself...
13477 Prospect Rd. Suite 204
Strongsville, Ohio 44149
Telephone: 440-236-6519
Web: http://www.timothymcginty.com
E-mail: tim@timothymcginty.com